Asylum
      and International Crimes 
        Asylum
      is an institution that provides for the protection of individuals whose
      life or liberty is threatened or endangered by acts of persecution or
      violence stemming from the acts or omissions of a State. 
      One form, political asylum, has been especially well-developed in
      Latin America.  States have accepted that there are limits to asylum, based
      on several sources of international law, including that asylum cannot be
      granted to persons with respect to whom there are serious indicia that
      they may have committed international crimes, such as crimes against
      humanity (which include the forced disappearance of persons, torture, and
      summary executions), war crimes, and crimes against peace.  According
      to article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, the States
      have an obligation to prevent, investigate, and punish any violation of
      the rights recognized therein.  The
      IACHR has stated previously that the evolution of the standards in public
      international law has consolidated the notion of universal jurisdiction,
      whereby any State has the authority to “prosecute and sanction
      individuals responsible for such international crimes, even those
      committed outside of a State’s territorial jurisdiction, or which do not
      relate to the nationality of the accused or of the victims, inasmuch as
      such crimes affect all of humanity and are in conflict with public order
      in the world community.”[1]
      The Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture and the
      Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons expressly
      provide that a State party should take the measures necessary to establish
      its jurisdiction over the crimes provided for in those instruments when
      the alleged offender is within its jurisdiction and it does not extradite
      him/her.  Based
      on the foregoing considerations, the Inter-American Commission should note
      that the institution of asylum is totally subverted by granting such
      protection to persons who leave their country to elude a determination of
      their liability as the material or intellectual author of international
      crimes.  The institution of
      asylum presupposes that the person seeking protection is persecuted in his
      or her state of origin, and is not supported by it in applying for asylum.  In
      view of the foregoing considerations, the Inter-American Commission on
      Human Rights, in the exercise of the power conferred on it by Article
      41(b) of the American Convention, hereby recommends to the Member States
      of the OAS that they refrain from granting asylum to any person alleged to
      be the material or intellectual author of international crimes.    Approved
      by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights at its 108º regular
      sessions, [ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ] [1]
          IACHR, Recommendations on Universal Jurisdiction and the International
          Criminal Court, Annual Report 1998, Ch. VII.  |