1.      
      Precautionary measures granted or extended by the Commission   7.      
      The precautionary measures are provided
      for in Article 29 of the Commission’s Regulations, which grants the
      Commission the following powers: 1) On its own initiative or at the
      request of a party, it may take any action that it considers necessary for
      the performance of its functions. 2) In urgent cases, when necessary to
      prevent irreparable harm to persons, the Commission may request that
      precautionary measures be taken to prevent the occurrence of irreparable
      harm, where the facts giving rise to the complaint are true. 3) If the
      Commission is not in session, the President or, in his absence, one of the
      Vice-Chairmen, shall consult via the Secretariat with the other members
      regarding application of the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 above. Where
      it is not possible to undertake the consultations in time, the Chairman
      shall take the decision on behalf of the Commission and shall communicate
      it immediately to the other members. And 4), any request for such measures
      and their adoption shall not prejudice the final decision.   8.      
      Below the IACHR presents a summary of the 52 precautionary measures
      granted or extended by the Commission in the period covering the 107th
      to 111th regular sessions, in order of the State to which the
      request was made. The number of precautionary measures, however, is not
      the same as the number of persons protected by them, since, as illustrated
      below, many of the precautionary measures granted by the IACHR are aimed
      at protecting an individual or often a group of persons who cannot be
      counted, such as entire populations or communities.   
        a.      
      Argentina         
        9.      
      On December 27, 2000, the IACHR requested that the Government of
      the Argentine Republic take precautionary measures on behalf of the
      petitioners in case 11.137, who were imprisoned and on a hunger strike:
      Isabel Fernández, Claudia Acosta, Gustavo Messutti, José Moreira, Sergio
      Paz, Claudio Enrique Veiga, Roberto Felicetti, Miguel Ángel Aguirre,
      Claudio Rodríguez, Luis Díaz, and Carlos Motto. The State took measures
      that led them to stop the hunger strike and reported this to the
      Commission, which also received information thereon from the petitioners.  b.      
      The Commonwealth of the Bahamas  10.    
      During the period in question, the Commission continued to receive
      information on the precautionary measures granted and reported on in its
      1998 and 1999 Annual Reports on behalf of Messrs. Michael Edwards (case
      12.067) and Omar Hall (case 12.068).           
      c.      
      Belize  11.    
      On October 20, 2000, the IACHR granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of the Maya Indigenous Communities and their members (case 12.053)
      and requested the State of Belize to take the necessary steps to suspend
      all permits, licenses, and concessions allowing for the drilling of oil
      and any other tapping of natural resources on lands used and occupied by
      the Maya Communities in the District of Toledo, in order to investigate
      the allegations in this case. The State did not reply to the
      Commission’s request.  d.      
      Brazil  12.    
      On March 9, 2000, the Commission requested that precautionary
      measures be adopted on behalf of Catherine Halvey, a human rights defender
      with the Human Rights Center of the Archdiocese of Manaos, who informed
      the IACHR that she had received several death threats as a result of her
      activities. The State informed the Commission that it had taken
      precautionary measures; those measures expired on September 9, 2000.  13.    
      On April 27, 2000, the Commission requested that precautionary
      measures be adopted on behalf of the São Paulo state police auditor,
      Benedito Mariano, and his family members. The Archbishop Emeritus of São
      Paulo requested those measures in response to threats Mr. Mariano
      received, presumably because of his activities monitoring police conduct.
      The State replied to the Commission’s request and reported that the
      precautionary measures had been granted. They expired on October 27, 2000.  14.    
      On December 21, 2000, the Commission requested precautionary
      measures on behalf of three Justice Advocates of São Paulo and their
      family members, as well as 16 persons detained in the Public Prison of
      Sorocaba in the State of São Paulo, who had received death threats
      presumably linked to the mistreatment and torture taking place in that
      prison (case 1.263). The measures requested guarantees for the right to
      life and physical integrity and the ability to testify without fear of
      reprisal. The State reported that it had transferred the guards involved
      in the case to administrative positions. The measures remain in effect
      until May 21, 2001.           
      e.      
      Canada           
      15.     During
      the period covered by this report, the Commission continued receiving
      information in relation to the precautionary measures granted and reported
      on in its 1998 and 1999 Annual Reports in favor of the Harte family (case
      11.862), and Mrs. Tavabeh Moeineddin and children (case 12.047).           
      f.      
      Colombia           
      16.     On
      May 11, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures and requested
      the Colombian State to take steps to protect the life and physical
      integrity of Alirio Uribe Muñoz, a well-known human rights defender and
      active member of the “José Alvear Restrepo” Lawyers Collective.
      Available information indicates that Mr. Uribe was identified in a
      military intelligence report as part of the “ELN support network.” The
      persons mentioned in the intelligence report have been victims of
      nonjudicial execution, forced disappearance, arbitrary detention, or
      constant threats, forcing them to move or exile themselves. Following the
      State’s reply, the parties continued to present information and
      observations on these precautionary measures.  17.    
      On May 11, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures and
      requested that the State take steps to protect the life and physical
      integrity of the political prisoners in buildings 1 and 2 of the National
      Model Prison in Bogotá. Based on available information, on April 27,
      2000, prisoners belonging to paramilitary groups detained in cellblock 5
      launched a violent attack on prisoners in cellblock 4, killing 47 inmates
      and injuring 17 others. The petitioners alleged that several prisoners
      from cellblocks 3 and 5, with Autodefensas
      Unidas de Colombia bracelets, carried long-range weapons when
      patrolling the facilities, making threats against political prisoners.
      Following the State’s reply, the parties continued to present
      information and observations on these precautionary measures.  18.    
      On May 22, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures and
      requested the Colombian State to take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of Juan Romaña, Leonel Bejarano, Jairo Robledo Martínez,
      Nilson Mosquera Sierra, Jacob Orejuela Mosquera, Apolinar Mosquera
      Murillo, Euclides Gutiérrez Prado, Yaila Yessi Mena del Pino, and Alba
      María Cuesta, members of the Central Committee of Displaced Persons and
      spokespersons for the internally-displaced communities that have currently
      settled in the city of Quibdó. According to the information contributed
      by the petitioner, these persons have been victims of plotting and
      accusations from members of the national police assigned to the
      Departmental Police of Chocó quartered in Quibdó, who claim the
      displaced persons are guerillas or sympathize with insurgent groups.
      Following the State’s reply, the parties continued to present
      information and observations on these precautionary measures.  19.    
      On May 26, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures for
      steps to be taken to protect the life and physical integrity of the
      members of the Organización Femenina Popoular headquarted in
      Barrancabermeja.  According to
      the available ifnoramtión, on May 22, 2000 a paramilitary group went to
      the headquarters of the Casa de la Mujer of Puerto Wilches
      and threatened the life of its coordinator, Flor María Cañas. The Organización
      Femenina Popular, together with members of Peace Brigades
      International, lodged a complaint with the corresponding authorities,
      after which the paramilitary group sent a message saying they know the
      international presence will not last forever and that the women will
      remain in the town [and] will therefore “suffer the consequences.”
      Following the State’s reply, the parties continued to present
      information and observations on these precautionary measures.  20.    
      On June 2, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures and
      requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of Jineth Bedoya Lima, a journalist for El
      Espectador; Hollman Morris Rincón, peace editor for El
      Espectador; and Jorge Cardona Alzate, judicial editor for El
      Espectador.  The available
      information indicates that on May 24, 2000, Jineth Bedoya received a call
      from an individual nicknamed “the baker” (“el Panadero”),
      who expressed interest in having a journalistic piece done on the
      paramilitary’s version of the outbreak of violence on April 27, 2000 in
      the National Model Prison of Bogotá. 
      The journalist was approached at the door of the facilities,
      surrounded, sedated, and driven to a nearby house where several
      individuals gagged and beat her and subjected her to degrading treatment. 
      She was then left in an unpopulated sector. 
      On June 19, 2000, the Commission requested that the Colombian State
      broaden the precautionary measures to include Alba Patricia Ribera Uribe,
      a journalist with NTC Noticias, who received threats similar to
      those of her colleagues. Following the State’s reply, the parties
      continued to present information and observations on these precautionary
      measures.  21.    
      On June 21, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures and
      requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of union leaders of the Municipal Utility Workers Union
      of Cali-SINTRAEMCALI, National Union of University Workers and Employees
      of Colombia, Cali Division, Central
      Unitaria de Trabajadores Sub-directiva Valle del Cauca, and the Union
      of the Department of Valle del Cauca. The available information indicates
      that these union leaders are in imminent danger due to the constant
      plotting and accusations of the civil and military authorities in the
      Department of Valle del Cauca, who claim the aforementioned persons are
      guerillas, terrorists, or sympathizers with insurgent groups. On July 6,
      2000, the Commission decided to broaden these precautionary measures to
      include Mr. Roberth Cañarte Montealegre and Fredy Ocoró B., in light of
      the request it received on July 4, 2000. The available information
      indicates that Roberth Cañarte Montealegre was detained by a group of
      uniformed men with long weapons who said they were members of the Autodefensas
      Unidas de Colombia (AUC); there has been no news of his whereabouts
      since then. Regarding Mr. Fredy Ocoró B., prosecuting attorney with the
      Union of Municipal Workers of Bugalagrande, his name appears on a list of
      the paramilitary group operating in the center of the Department of Valle
      alongside another union leader who was recently executed. Following the
      State’s reply, the parties continued to present information and
      observations on these precautionary measures.  22.    
      On October 16, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      and requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of the management and workers at the Regional Committee
      for the Protection of Human Rights in Magdalena Medio (CREDHOS),
      headquartered in Barrancabermeja. According to available information, a
      course entitled “Forum for life and human rights” was held in
      Barrancabermeja, with State representatives and human rights defenders.
      Copies of a “condolence card” from Autodefensas
      Unidas de Colombia (AUC) were found there, making death threats
      against members of the organization. The Commission also requested that
      the State report on measures taken to (a) shed light on the serious
      complaints of law enforcement’s tolerance or sponsorship of paramilitary
      groups stationed in Barrancabermeja and Yondó; and (b) guarantee that law
      enforcement complies with its legal functions and does not tolerate or
      sponsor paramilitary groups operating in the area. Following the State’s
      reply, the parties continued to present information and observations on
      these precautionary measures.  23.    
      On November 1, 2000, the Commission requested that the Colombian
      State broaden the measures granted in 1999 on behalf of the spokespersons
      for the campesino exodus from southern Bolívar, with a view to
      protecting the life and physical integrity of the members of the Asociación
      Campesina del Valle del Río Cimitarra, who were declared military
      targets by paramilitary groups in the region and have been subject to
      systematic threats, as well as fatal attacks on its leaders. Following the
      State’s reply, the parties continued to present information and
      observations on these precautionary measures.  24.    
      On December 19, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      and requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of Dr. Carlos Arturo Romero Jiménez, attorney,
      university professor, and former member of the Communist Party and the Unión
      Patriótica, and his wife Dr. Clara López Obregón. The available
      information indicates that in November 2000, Dr. Romero Jiménez received
      a series of pamphlets threatening his life. On December 13, 2000, Dr.
      Romero’s driver was intercepted by two men on a motorcycle, who asked
      him if Dr. Romero had left the country and told him that they were
      “going to kill him.” Following the State’s reply, the parties
      continued to present information and observations on these precautionary
      measures.  25.    
      On December 29, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      and requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of the President of the National Federation of State
      Workers, Wilson Alfonso Borja Díaz, who was attacked on December 15,
      2000, leaving both he and his escorts injured. Shortly thereafter,
      paramilitary leader Carlos Castaño Gil claimed responsibility for the
      attack in the press and indicated that Mr. Borja Díaz remained a military
      target. Following the State’s reply, the parties continued to present
      information and observations on these precautionary measures.  26.    
      On January 30, 2001, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      and requested that the Colombian State take steps to protect the life and
      physical integrity of Dr. Gloria Gaitán Jaramillo. The available
      information indicates that Dr. Gaitán Jaramillo was harassed and
      persecuted both at home and at her workplace as a result of her efforts to
      further the investigation into the assassination of her father, Jorge Eliécer
      Gaitán, through the so-called “National and International Campaign of
      the Court of Truth.” Following the State’s reply, the parties
      continued to present information and observations on these precautionary
      measures.  27.    
      On March 2, 2001, the Commission granted precautionary measures and
      contacted the Colombian State to request that steps be taken to protect
      the life and physical integrity of the members of the Asociación
      Nacional de Mujeres Campesinas e Indígenas de Colombia (rural and
      indigenous women’s association, ANMUCIC) and its Chair, Mrs. Leonora
      Castaño.  The information
      available indicates that several members of ANMUCIC have been threatened
      and attacked and as a result have had to move to other parts of the
      country, go into exile, or suspend the work of the Organization in certain
      regions of the country.  The
      Commission requested the State to adopt measures to guarantee the life and
      physical integrity of Ms. Leonora Castaño and to protect the offices of
      ANMUCIC, especially those in Bogotá, by common accord with the
      petitioners and protected persons, and to investigate, try, and punish
      those responsible for the threats and harassment endured by ANMUCIC and
      its members.  g.                
      Costa Rica   28.    
      On March 1, 2001, the Commission requested that the State adopt
      precautionary measures on behalf of Mauricio Herrera Ulloa and Fernán
      Vargas Rohrmoser, a representative of La Nación newspaper. 
      According to available information, Tribunal III of the Supreme
      Court of Costa Rica upheld the criminal conviction of Mr. Herrera, for the
      alleged pain and suffering caused by reporting information published in
      the European media questioning a former Costa Rican ambassador. 
      The Commission requested that the State suspend execution of his
      sentence, to give it time to conduct a full investigation of the
      allegations raised in the petition, on the grounds that executing it
      before the Commission investigated the case would cause irreparable harm
      to Messrs. Herrera and Vargas, the latter being a representative of “La
      Nación.”  h.                
      Ecuador  29.    
      During the period in question, the Commission continued to receive
      information on the precautionary measures voluntarily granted by the State
      of Ecuador on June 14, 1999 on behalf of Pedro Giovanny Baque Tuáres,
      Pedro F. Baque Coronel, Olinda Tuárez Loor, Carol Baque Tuáres, Javier
      Baque Tuáres, Homero Alberto Palacios Palma, and Julio Paéz García.            
      i.       
      El Salvador           
      30.     On
      February 29, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on behalf
      of Mr. Jorge Odir Miranda Cortez and 26 other members of the Asociación
      Atlacatl, according to which the right to life and health of said persons
      was in grave danger, since they required care from State institutions to
      access the medicine they need for treatment. The Commission requested that
      the Salvadoran State provide treatment and antiretroviral drugs, as well
      as the pertinent hospital, pharmacological, and nutritional care. The
      IACHR received information from both parties on the actions taken to care
      for the aforementioned persons. On June 26, 2000, the Board of Directors
      of the Salvadoran Social Security Institute authorized the procurement of
      the triple antiretroviral therapy for persons who are HIV-positive or have
      AIDS in that country. Starting on that date, the State began to provide
      the requested treatment. The precautionary measures expired on August 29,
      2000, at the end of the six-month period initially requested by the
      Commission.   j.       
      Grenada  31.     On April 13, 2000, the Commission decided to
      publish its report Nº 38/00 on case 11.743. 
      One of the recommendations of the Commission in that report was a
      request to the State of Grenada to adopt precautionary measures on behalf
      of Rudolph Baptiste, in order to stay his execution. 
      As this report went to press, the Inter-American Commission had not
      received any reply from the State of Grenada.  32.    
      On October 20, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of Donnason Knights, case 12.028, and requested the State to
      stay execution of the death penalty. 
      As this report went to press, the Inter-American Commission had not
      received any reply from the State.           
      k.      
      Guatemala          
      33.    
      On September 12, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary
      measures on behalf of Aura Elena Farfán, President of the Association of
      Family Members of the Detained-Disappeared of Guatemala (FAMDEGUA) to
      guarantee her life and physical integrity. The IACHR also requested that
      effective measures be taken to guarantee the safety of persons who visit
      or work at the FAMDEGUA offices. The precautionary measures were granted
      as a result of the robbery and breaking and entering at the FAMDEGUA
      offices--a petitioner in the case of the Dos Erres village massacre
      (case 11.681) being processed by the Commission. The Guatemalan State
      informed the Commission that the alleged perpetrators had been captured
      and that the pertinent judicial investigations are being conducted. It
      also reported that police protection is being provided for the FAMDEGUA
      offices.           
      l.       
      Guyana           
      34.     On
      April 4, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on behalf of
      Franz Britton, better known as Collie Wills, who allegedly disappeared on
      January 27, 2000, following his detention on January 25, 2000. The
      Commission requested that the Government of Guyana take the necessary
      measures to ensure respect for Mr. Britton’s life and to present
      information on the facts that gave rise to this petition filed with the
      inter-American system. Through letters dated August 24, 2000 and February
      4, 2001, the Commission reiterated its request for information on the
      case, but has not received a reply from the State.  m.     
      Haiti  35.    
      On April 19, 2000, the IACHR granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Pierre Espérance and members of the National Coalition for
      Haitians’ Rights (NCHR), requesting that the Haitian State adopt the
      necessary measures to ensure the physical integrity and life of said
      persons. Those measures were granted based on the fact that, according to
      the information provided, Mr. Pierre Espérance, a human rights defender,
      had suffered various acts of intimidation, threats, assaults, and even an
      armed assault that left him seriously wounded. Members of the NCHR have
      also suffered various acts of intimidation and aggression. The
      precautionary measures were granted for a six-month period. The Commission
      has not received any information from the parties.   36.    
      On November 13, 2000, the IACHR granted general precautionary
      measures on behalf of persons affected by the tension resulting from the
      electoral process in Haiti and, in particular, on behalf of Messrs. Jean-Baptiste
      Dieugrand, Hébert Chèristan, and Hervé Denis. The Haitian State was
      requested to take the necessary measures to respect and ensure the full
      and free exercise of the following rights: freedom of conscience, thought,
      and expression and the right to assembly, association, free movement, and
      residence, political rights, and due process. Based on the information the
      IACHR received, there were several acts of violence, persecution, and
      threats attributed to members of the government, government security
      forces, or private agents tolerated or motivated by those parties against
      several political opponents. The State took no action regarding the
      requested protection.           
      n.      
      Honduras  37.    
      On July 18, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of journalist Julio César Pineda Alvarado, to prevent the risks he
      is facing from materializing, based on information presented to the
      Commission, and to guarantee his unrestricted ability to work as a
      journalist in Honduras. During the period in question, the parties
      continued to present information and observations related to the
      precautionary measures and the journalist’s situation.  o.      
      Jamaica  38.    
      On May 2, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Denton Aitken, sentenced to death in Jamaica, whose case
      (12.275) is pending before the Commission. The Commission requested that
      the State stay the execution until the Commission has the opportunity to
      examine the case, on the grounds that executing Mr. Aitken before the
      Commission examined the allegations in this case would cause Mr. Aitken
      irreparable harm. The Commission did not receive a reply to its request
      from the State.   39.    
      On December 4, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of Dave Sewell, who was sentenced to death in Jamaica and whose
      case (12.347) is pending before the Commission. The Commission requested
      that the State suspend the execution until the Commission has the
      opportunity to examine the case, on the grounds that executing Mr. Sewell
      before the Commission examined his claims would cause irreparable harm.
      The Commission did not receive a reply to its request from the State.           
      p.      
      Nicaragua  40.    
      On July 17, 2000, the IACHR granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Vilma Núñez de Escorcia for the Nicaraguan State to take the
      necessary steps to protect the life and physical integrity of Mrs. Núñez
      de Escorcia, a human rights defender, who had received a series of death
      threats. The parties continued to present information and observations in
      connection with these measures. q.       Panama         
       41.    
      On July 7, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Mr. Carlos A. Singares Campbell, director of the “El Siglo”
      newspaper in Panama. According to the information received, Mr. Singares
      was detained for violation of the desacato
      laws (defamation), following the publication of a critical newspaper
      article potentially implicating Attorney General José Antonio Sossa in
      illegal acts. The Commission granted precautionary measures for 30 days
      and requested that the State nullify the arrest warrant and guarantee his
      right to physical integrity and freedom of expression.  r.       
      Peru  42.    
      On March 10, 2000, the Commission requested that the Peruvian State
      take precautionary measures on behalf of Genaro Delgado Parker, who,
      according to the information received, was stripped of control of the
      “Red Global” TV station and the radiobroadcasting equipment at the
      “Radio 1160” station he owns. The initial term of the precautionary
      measures expired without their implementation by the State, therefore the
      Commission extended the measures for six months until November 2, 2000. On
      December 18, 2000, the Peruvian State reported that it had complied with
      the Commission’s request.  43.    
      On March 17, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      and requested that the Peruvian State adopt effective measures to
      guarantee the physical integrity and life of Mrs. Erika Milagros Martínez
      Liñan and Mr. Carlos Armando Rodríguez Iglesias, as well as their family
      members, including protective measures that would not interfere with their
      freedom of movement and expression. The IACHR also asked Peru to launch an
      investigation into threats that those individuals had received. These
      precautionary measures are based on a request presented to the IACHR
      indicating that Mr. Rodríguez and Mrs. Martínez had received threats
      after publicly announcing that they helped falsify electoral ballots in
      the May 2000 elections. The State replied on April 20, 2000 and reported
      that the National Police of Peru had offered personal guarantees to the
      aforementioned persons.   44.    
      On May 26, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Mr. Fabián Salazar Olivares, which were transmitted in the
      context of case 12.286. According to the information received, National
      Intelligence Service (SIN) agents entered the office of the newspaper
      where Mr. Salazar works and tortured him in order to remove videos from
      him. Mr. Salazar was hospitalized for cuts on his left arm. The Commission
      requested that the Peruvian State take steps to protect Mr. Salazar’s
      life, physical integrity, and freedom. On July 14, 2000, the State
      indicated that it could not comply with the precautionary measures because
      Mr. Salazar had left the country on May 31, 2000. s.      
      Trinidad and Tobago  45.    
      On November 15, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of Balkissoon Roodal, sentenced to death in Trinidad and Tobago,
      whose case (12.342) is pending before the Commission. The Commission
      requested that the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago stay his execution
      until a decision can be made on the merits of the case. It based its
      request on the fact that if the State were to execute Mr. Roodal before
      such an assessment, any later decision of the Commission would be
      ineffective in providing potential remedies and that this would cause him
      irreparable harm. The State did not reply to the Commission’s request.   46.    
      On December 1, 2000, the Commission requested that the State take
      precautionary measures on behalf of Sheldon Roach, sentenced to death in
      Trinidad and Tobago, whose case (12.346) is pending before the Commission.
      The Commission requested that the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago stay his
      execution until a decision can be made on the merits of the case. It based
      its request on the fact that if the State were to execute Mr. Roach before
      such an assessment, any later decision of the Commission would be
      ineffective in providing potential remedies and that this would cause him
      irreparable harm. The State did not reply to the Commission’s request.   t.      
      United States  47.    
      On January 6, 2000, the Commission requested the adoption of
      precautionary measures on behalf of Douglas Christopher Thomas, sentenced
      to death, whose execution was scheduled for January 10, 2000 in the State
      of Virginia and whose case (12.240) is pending before the Commission. The
      Commission requested that the State stay the execution, to give it time to
      fully examine the allegations made in the petition, on the grounds that
      executing Mr. Thomas before the Commission could investigate the case
      would cause irreparable harm. On January 11, 2000, the State informed the
      Commission that the U.S. federal government had no involvement with the
      case prior to the receipt of the Commission’s request and that Mr.
      Thomas had been executed by the State of Virginia on January 10, 2000,
      after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant a stay.   48.    
      On January 27, 2000, the Commission requested that the State adopt
      precautionary measures on behalf of Juan Raúl Garza (case 12.243),
      sentenced to death, whose execution was scheduled for August 5, 2000 in
      the State of Indiana. The Commission requested that the State take the
      necessary measures to preserve the life and integrity of Mr. Garza, so it
      can investigate the allegations made in the petition to the inter-American
      system, on the grounds that executing Mr. Garza before the Commission
      could examine the case would cause irreparable harm. Mr. Garza later
      received two temporary stays of execution from the President of the United
      States on August 21 and December 12, 2000.   49.    
      On February 4, June 15, and June 22, 2000, the Commission
      reiterated its request that the State adopt precautionary measures on
      behalf of Shaka Sankofa (better known as Gary Graham), with a view to the
      State giving him a stay of execution until the Commission has time to
      investigate the facts of the case (11.193). On June 15, 2000, during its
      107th session, the Commission adopted Report 51/00 in which it
      found Mr. Sankofa’s case admissible. The State did not respond to the
      Commission; on June 22, 2000, Mr. Sankofa was executed.  50.    
      On March 13, 2000, the Commission requested the adoption of
      precautionary measures on behalf of Víctor Saldaño (case 12.254), an
      Argentine citizen sentenced to death in the State of Texas. The Commission
      requested that the State take the necessary measures to preserve the life
      and physical integrity of Mr. Saldaño, so it can investigate the
      allegations made in the petition, on the grounds that executing Mr. Saldaño
      before the Commission could investigate the case would cause irreparable
      harm. On June 5, 2000, the Supreme Court revoked the death sentence and
      returned his case to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, for its
      judgment. In a letter dated November 10, 2000, the State informed the
      Commission that it received information from the Texas Court of Criminal
      Appeals that a public hearing would be held on December 13, 2000; it was
      later postponed until February 28, 2001.   51.    
      On May 26, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures on
      behalf of Michael Domingues (case 12.285), sentenced to death in the State
      of Nevada. The Inter-American Commission requested that the State take the
      necessary measures to preserve the life and physical integrity of Mr.
      Domingues, so it can investigate the allegations made in the petition, on
      the grounds that executing Mr. Domingues before the Commission could
      examine the case would cause irreparable harm. The State did not reply to
      the Commission’s request.   52.    
      On October 25, 2000, the Commission requested that the State adopt
      precautionary measures on behalf of Miguel Ángel Flores (case 12.333), a
      Mexican citizen sentenced to death in the State of Texas, and requested
      that the United States stay his execution, scheduled for November 9, 2000,
      so it can investigate the allegations made in the petition, on the grounds
      that executing Mr. Flores before the Commission could examine the case
      would cause irreparable harm. In a letter dated November 7, 2000, the
      Commission reiterated its request for an urgent reply regarding the
      precautionary measures granted. The Commission did not receive a reply
      from the State, and Mr. Flores was executed on November 9, 2000.   53.    
      On November 8, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of Johnny Paul Penry (case 12.340), sentenced to death in the
      State of Texas, and requested that the State stay his execution scheduled
      for November 16, 2000, so it can investigate the allegations brought
      before the inter-American system, on the grounds that executing Mr. Penry
      before the Commission could examine the case would cause irreparable harm.
      In a letter dated November 14, 2000, the Commission reiterated its request
      that the State reply regarding the precautionary measures requested. In a
      note dated November 14, 2000, the State informed the Commission that it
      had submitted its request to the pertinent government authorities for
      their consideration. The U.S. Supreme Court stayed Mr. Penry’s execution
      on November 16, 2000.  54.    
      On November 10, 2000, the Commission requested that the State adopt
      precautionary measures on behalf of Mr. James Wilson Chambers (case
      12.341), who was sentenced to death in the State of Missouri. The
      Commission requested that the State stay his execution, scheduled for
      November 15, 2000, until it has had the opportunity to investigate the
      allegations made in the petition, on the grounds that executing Mr.
      Chambers before the Commission examined the case would cause him
      irreparable harm. In a letter dated November 14, 2000, the State informed
      the Commission that it would transmit the request to the pertinent
      government authorities for their consideration. The Commission later
      received word that Mr. Chambers was executed on November 15, 2000.   55.    
      On December 16, 2000, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of Alexander Williams (case 12.348), sentenced to death in the
      State of Georgia, requesting that the State stay the execution of Mr.
      Williams in order to investigate the allegations brought before the
      inter-American system, on the grounds that executing him before the
      Commission investigated the case would cause irreparable harm. The State
      did not reply to the Commission’s request.   56.    
      On December 15, 2000, the Commission requested the adoption of
      precautionary measures on behalf of Mr. José Jacobo Amaya Ruíz (case
      12.351), a Salvadoran citizen scheduled to be executed on January 18, 2001
      in the State of Arizona. The Commission requested that the State preserve
      the life and physical integrity of Mr. Amaya, so it could fully
      investigate the allegations made to the Inter-American system, on the
      grounds that executing Mr. Amaya before the Commission examined the case
      would cause irreparable harm. Through a letter dated January 8, 2001, the
      State informed the Commission that it had transmitted the request for
      precautionary measures to the Attorney General of the State of Arizona for
      consideration and reiterated its position that the Commission’s
      recommendations are not binding for the State.  u.      
      Venezuela  57.    
      On February 7, 2001, the Commission granted precautionary measures
      on behalf of journalist Pablo López Ulacio, director of the weekly “La
      Razón”. The Commission indicated that Mr. López Ulacio “is at
      grave risk and requested that the affronts on the journalist’s freedom
      of expression be stopped and, as a result, that the censorship measures
      against him be lifted, including those on La Razón.” The parties
      have provided information to the Commission on those precautionary
      measures.   58. On March 12, 2001, the Commission agreed to adopt precautionary measures to preserve, inter alia, the right to life and physical integrity of Colombian refugees in Venezuela, Manuel de Jesús Pinilla Camacho et al. Based on the information supplied by the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), the Programa Venezolano de Educación-Acción en Derechos Humanos (PROVEA), the Oficina de Acción Social del Vicaria [ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]  |