|
SPEECH
BY JUAN E. MÉNDEZ, PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS, ON THE PRESENTATION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION’S REPORT ON
TERRORISM AND HUMAN RIGHTS TO THE COMMITTEE ON JURIDICAL AND POLITICAL
AFFAIRS, OAS PERMANENT COUNCIL Washington, D.C., December 12, 2002 Chairman and Members of the Committee on Juridical and Political Affairs, I
am very pleased to address you today in order to present for your
consideration the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’ Report on
Terrorism and Human Rights. Terrorism
and the violence and fear it perpetuates have been a prevalent and
distressing feature of the modern history of the Americas, and one with
which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights is all too familiar.
The three terrorist attacks of unprecedented proportion perpetrated
simultaneously in the United States on September 11, 2001 confirm that
terrorism remains an on going, serious and expanded threat to the
protection of human rights and to regional and international peace and
security, a threat that demands immediate and thorough consideration by
the international community, including the organs of the Organization of
American States. Among
the issues discussed in the media and elsewhere since September 11, 2001
have been questions concerning what measures should be taken to combat
terrorism and how fundamental human rights apply to those measures. This
has included debate over what means are most appropriate for detaining,
investigating, prosecuting and punishing those suspected of terrorist
activities. In this context, the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights, as the organ of the OAS responsible for promoting the observance
and protection of human rights in the Hemisphere and to serve as a
consultative organ of the Organization in these matters, adopted a
resolution on December 12, 2001 in which it decided to prepare a
comprehensive report on terrorism and human rights, to assist member
states in adopting anti-terrorism laws and regulations that accord with
international law. The OAS General Assembly, in a resolution adopted on
June 4, 2002 during its thirty-second regular session, welcomed the
Commission’s decision to prepare a report on terrorism and human rights
and requested that the Commission present the report to the Permanent
Council for its consideration, if possible, in 2002.
After
twelve months of extensive and careful deliberations, the Commission is
pleased to present you with its final report. In preparing the report, the
Commission drew upon its longstanding experience in dealing with human
rights protections in the face of terrorism. In addition, it convened a
panel of international experts during its regular sessions in March 2002
to obtain timely and specialized information on the issue of terrorism and
human rights, and invited OAS member states and pertinent non-governmental
organizations to submit written observations on this topic. Throughout
its report, the Commission articulates several core principles concerning
the role of human rights in opposing terrorism. The Commission indicates
in no uncertain terms that governments of the Americas are obliged to take
the measures necessary to prevent terrorism and other forms of violence
and to guarantee the security of their populations. At the same time, the
Commission declares that states remain bound by their international human
rights obligations at all times, subject only to suspensions or
restrictions that are specifically permitted under international law when
the life of the nation is threatened. The Commission categorically rejects
any notion that international law is irrelevant or inapplicable to the
post-September 11 campaign against terrorism. In this respect, the
Commission commends OAS member states for including in the
recently-adopted Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism a provision,
Article 15, by which they explicitly confirm their commitment to full
respect for the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms in the
campaign against terrorism. The
report also acknowledges that terrorist violence may occur in times of
peace, in states of emergency, and in situations of war, and therefore
considers states’ obligations under both international human rights and
the law of armed conflict. The report considers standards of protection
under these regimes of law in six main areas: the right to life, the right
to humane treatment, the right to personal liberty and security, the right
to a fair trial, the right to freedom of expression, the rights to
judicial protection and non-discrimination, and the protection of
migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and other non-nationals. The
report emphasizes, for example, that detainees must never be subjected to
torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,
through conditions of detention, methods of interrogation or otherwise.
Closely connected with this proscription is the requirement that the
treatment of detainees be subjected to appropriate oversight mechanisms as
prescribed under applicable regimes of international law, in times of
peace and in times of war. The report stresses that persons charged with
and tried for terrorist-related offenses must, in all situations, be
afforded fundamental due process protections, including the right of a
defendant to prompt notification in detail of the charges against them,
the right to be assisted by counsel without delay, and the right to a
public trial. Moreover, the report urges member states to guarantee the
right to freedom of expression in all circumstances and subject only to
permissible restrictions and derogations, as an informed public can be an
effective tool in monitoring and preventing abuses by public authorities
during situations of terrorist threat. The situation of migrants,
refugees, asylum seekers and other non-nationals is afforded specific
attention by the Commission, as these persons are particularly vulnerable
to human rights violations in the development and execution of
counter-terrorist measures. Finally, the report emphasizes the need for
states to comply in all circumstances and situations with the absolute
prohibition of discrimination of any kind, including discrimination based
upon race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, economic status, birth or any other social
condition. The report concludes with a series of specific recommendations
for OAS member states to give effect to the Commission’s conclusions. In
its resolution adopting and opening for signature the Inter-American
Convention Against Terrorism, the OAS General Assembly proclaimed that
“the fight against terrorism must be undertaken with full respect for
national and international law, human rights, and democratic institutions,
in order to preserve the rule of law, liberties and democratic values in
the Hemisphere, which are essential components of a successful fight
against terrorism.” The Commission is hopeful that the results of its
study will assist OAS member states and other interested actors in the
inter-American system in fulfilling this crucial responsibility. Thank
you.
|